O presente trabalho insere-se no âmbito de um protocolo entre o IMT - Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. (IMT) e o Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC) e destina-se a dar resposta à medida 25.92 do objetivo estratégico

O presente trabalho insere-se no âmbito de um protocolo entre o IMT - Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. (IMT) e o Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC) e destina-se a dar resposta à medida 25.92 do objetivo estratégico Infraestruturas Mais Seguras da Estratégia Nacional consistindo na elaboração de uma norma técnicapara aplicação a arruamentos urbanos, que possa contribuir para promover a melhoria darede rodoviária municipal, designadamente através da adoção, no País, de critérios uniformes no dimensionamento do traçado e no ordenamento da envolvente dos arruamentos urbanos, aspetos importantes para a obtenção de rodovias autoexplicativas necessárias para o pretendido Sistema Seguro.A norma técnica está organizada em quatro fascículos, destinados a contemplar os fundamentos sobre utentes e rede rodoviária, as características geométricas para rodovias com tráfego motorizado e não motorizado e as medidas de acalmia de tráfego aplicáveis a cada tipo de arruamento.Apresenta-se neste documento o Fascículo III, relativo às caraterísticas geométricas para vias de tráfego não motorizado, onde se incluem considerações sobre os caminhos pedonais e sobre os percursos para velocípedes. São também apresentadas considerações sobre o estacionamento de veículos não motorizados e as particularidades da conceção das zonas de coexistência.

O presente trabalho insere-se no âmbito de um protocolo entre o IMT - Instituto da Mobilidade e dos Transportes, I.P. (IMT) e o Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil (LNEC) e destina-se a dar resposta à medida 25.92 do objetivo estratégico Infraestruturas Mais Seguras da Estratégia Nacional de Segurança Rodoviária

The Technical Guide presents the 4th generation of the service quality assessment system, which abandons some 3rd generation indicators and adds new ones to respond to the latest challenges to supply services, urban waste water management and urban waste management. Changes are also made to definitions and benchmarks for some indicators are adjusted.

This report of Work Package 5

This report contains the Living Lab final Strategic Agendas as agreed with stakeholders in the Communities of Practice and a description of their development process. Within the final Strategic Agendas, some main achievements during the B-WaterSmart project to achieve the strategic objectives that were set for the specific Living Labs are highlighted. Furthermore, the next steps to realise the Strategic Agendas are elaborated. For some of the Living Labs becoming a Water-Oriented Living Lab and/or a member of the European Network of Living Labs will be a key factor for ensuring the continuation of the Living Lab after the end of the B-WaterSmart project.

Deliverable D1.1 provides a framework of key indicators of green space characteristics that have a high potential to be relevant regarding their impact on health and well-being. These indicators comprise the characteristics of a nature site, and its context, including the variables that can impact health and well-being, and also the requests that ensure people can have comfort and their basic needs attended to. Moreover, NATURELAB's holistic strategy seeks to offer also indicators that go beyond health and well-being, enhancing the resilience of the sites and the population therefore boosting communities

Within the scope of WP5

This deliverable focuses on the purpose, scope, and assumptions of the resilience assessment method. It presents the structure of the method and of the frameworks. Two frameworks are provided, the ICARIA RAF (Resilience Assessment Framework) for a holistic assessment and, as a starting point, the ICARIA RAT (Resilience Assessment Tool) for a specific assessment of critical infrastructure and critical entities. Their concepts, detailed structure, tools, and outputs are described in this deliverable. Details are given on data input (namely data from modelling activities) and data output (namely to the decision support system). User guidance is provided for the successful implementation of a resilience assessment.

This document is the third version of the Implementation Plan and Risk Contingency Plan. First, it indicates how the work of the project has been divided and organized as well as the way to evaluate if the project objectives are reached according to the schedule and within the budget. Additionally, it defines key steps to follow in order to initiate the project action. The second part lists a number of risks that could affect different aspects of the project outcome. It includes risk mitigation measures and a contingency plan for each case.